You wish excluded from the Virtual drive.įrom what I understand there are very few malware tools which canĪffect it. Won't need all those damn intrusive, costly (each year subscription)Īnd pain in the arse AV - Internet Suite"programs. Use a Virtual Machine program such as Toolwiz's Time Freeze and you They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again. Somehow superior by attacking the messenger. TheyĬannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. You insist I have said things I did not, etc. When was the last time you showed understanding? You make the mostīizarre of claims, like how you have codecs you later deny having, how > you might read it, perhaps even 'study' it, but you fail to understand I do read/study everything before I post. notable and wp put notable in italics to address > "This is a non-exhaustive list of notable antivirus and Internet The Clamav story is more interesting to me than the ClamXAV story, and
#Clamxav registration keys mac
Of the desktop market, and if a Mac user DID decide on an AV, there are Profit, which would seem to me to be a 'shaky' endeavor.Ĭlamav has a niche role which itself has alternatives MacOS desktop hasĪ questionable/debatable need for any AV, MacOS has a very modest slice So, there's nothing unusual about Canimaan attempting to do it for Also,Ĭisco now 'owns' ClamAV as Talos in terms of copyright, branding, andĪs I posted earlier, there are a number of different developers who haveĪlso put a GUI on clamav for Mac, Fink, Homebrew, MacPorts and > It would also be nice to have a specification as to which notability criteria are used for list inclusion (these surely cannot be the same as the criteria for creation of whole articles).ĬlamAV is 'important' enough to have a significant wp article. Because assessing the notability of anything is one of the most contentious issues amongst Wikipedians, reasons need to be given. > The footnote listing products removed as non-notable does not give any reasons for their exclusion. 'non-notable' ware which had been removed: 'notable' really means and that there should be some 'definition'Īpparently in some earlier edit there was a footnote naming some The talk section also gets into the business about what In the talk section there is commentary about mbam missing, so it wasĪdded later. I expect you noticed that even Malwarebytes is listed! (and it's not
0 kommentar(er)
